| 2000 vs. 2016 Total Employment Growth and Change Lincoln County 2000 vs. 2016 Net Percent Change = 230.19% Rank = #1 McPherson County 2000 vs. 2016 Net Percent Change = -16.66% Rank = #66 Butte County 2000 vs. 2016 Net Percent Change = 9.34% Rank = #24 With a spotlight on Butte County, the chart above displays the distribution of the net percent change of employment across South Dakota's 66 counties over the period 2000-2016. Those counties whose employment growth registered above the statewide average over this period realized an increase in their statewide share of employment. Likewise, those counties whose employment growth registered below the statewide average experienced a decline in their relative share of employment statewide. Statewide Snippets:- Over 2000-2016 employment grew in forty-three South Dakota counties while declining in twenty-three.
- Employment growth in eleven counties outpaced the statewide average (16.57%), while growth in fifty-five counties trailed.
- At the extremes of the distribution, Lincoln County posted the highest growth of employment (230.19%), while McPherson County placed last by logging a -16.66% decline.
- The spread in employment growth between the highest (Lincoln County, 230.19%) and lowest (McPherson County, -16.66%) over 2000-2016 equated to 246.85% ( = 230.19% − -16.66%).
- Employment growth statewide is but a weighted metric that stems from each county's share of employment statewide. On this point, as the largest county in South Dakota, Minnehaha County's net employment growth over 2000-2016 of 27,997 made up 32.98% of the total net growth statewide (84,886):
Minnehaha County: Percent Share of South Dakota's
Employment Growth, 2000-2016:32.98% = (27,997 / 84,886) x 100 Butte County Snippets:- Over 2000-2016, Butte County posted a 9.34% net gain in employment.
- Butte County was joined by fifty-four other counties whose employment growth over 2000-2016 registered below the statewide average (16.57%).
- Ranked #24 among South Dakota's 66 counties, Butte County's employment growth (9.34%) trailed the statewide average of 16.57% by a 7.23% margin.
- Butte County's net employment growth (9.34%, #24) over 2000-2016 registered just above that of Kingsbury County (9.01%, #25) and just below that of Brown County (10.69%, #23).
- Butte County's share of employment statewide slipped from 0.92% in 2000 to 0.86% in 2016, resulting in a share-shift of -0.06%.
Data Definition The BEA employment series for states and local areas comprises estimates of the number of jobs, full-time plus part-time, by place of work. Full-time and part-time jobs are counted at equal weight. Employees, sole proprietors, and active partners are included, but unpaid family workers and volunteers are not included. Proprietors employment consists of the number of sole proprietorships and the number of partners in partnerships. The description "by place of work" applies to the wage and salary portion of the series and, with relatively little error, to the entire series. The proprietors employment portion of the series, however, is more nearly by place of residence because, for nonfarm sole proprietorships, the estimates are based on IRS tax data that reflect the address from which the proprietor's individual tax return is filed, which is usually the proprietor's residence. The nonfarm partnership portion of the proprietors employment series reflects the tax-filing address of the partnership, which may be either the residence of one of the partners or the business address of the partnership. The employment estimates are designed to be consistent with the estimates of wages and salaries and proprietors' income that are part of the personal income series. The employment estimates are based on the same sets of source data as the corresponding earnings estimates and are prepared with parallel methodologies. Two forms of proprietors' income-the income of limited partnerships and the income of tax-exempt cooperatives-have no corresponding employment estimates. United States. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Income Division.
Regional Definitions. 2023. Web.
https://apps.bea.gov/regional/definitions/ | | | | | | County Distribution of Employment Growth, 2000 vs. 2016 | | More
than
40% | 40%
to
30% | 30%
to
20% | 20%
to
10% | 10%
to
0% | 0%
to
-10% | -10%
to
-20% | -20%
or
Below | Total | | 2000 vs. 2016 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 66 | | | | | | | Minnehaha County 2016 Employment = 158,648 Percent of State = 26.56% Rank = #1 Ziebach County 2016 Employment = 619 Percent of State = 0.10% Rank = #66 Butte County 2016 Employment = 5,165 Percent of State = 0.86% Rank = #19 Again highlighting Butte County's position, the bar graph above displays the disposition by county of 2016 employment statewide (597,263).  Tip: Although the visual profile of the bar chart remains unchanged you may opt to display the actual total by using the "Select Indicator" options above the graph
Statewide Snippets:- Ranked #1, Minnehaha County's 2016 employment totaled 158,648, equating to 26.56% of the statewide total.
- Ranked last (#66), Ziebach County's employment of 619 in 2016 comprised just 0.10% of the total statewide. Ziebach County's employment in 2016 equates to less than .01% to that of Minnehaha County's.
- Minnehaha County's 2016 employment (158,648) exceeded the combined employment (151,412) of South Dakota's fifty-three smallest counties.
Butte County Snippets:- Butte County's employment in 2016 ranked #19, amounting to 0.86% of the statewide total.
- Butte County's employment of 5,165 placed below that of Charles Mix County's (5,550, #18), and just above that of Oglala Lakota County's (4,871, #20).
- Butte County's employment of 5,165 exceeds the combined total (4,822) of South Dakota's six smallest counties.
| | | | | | County Distribution of Employment, 2016 | | More
than
50,000 | 50,000
to
40,000 | 40,000
to
30,000 | 30,000
to
20,000 | 20,000
to
10,000 | 10,000
or
Below | Total | | 2016 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 53 | 66 | | | | | | | Tip: To augment your analysis click on the column headers in the following table to rank and/or sort the data. | | | | | | South Dakota Employment by County:
2000 vs. 2016 | | 2000 | | 2016 | | 2000 - 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,757 | 0.34 | | 1,707 | 0.29 | | -2.85 | -50 | -0.06 | -0.06 | | | 10,894 | 2.13 | | 11,672 | 1.95 | | 7.14 | 778 | 0.92 | -0.17 | | | 1,545 | 0.30 | | 1,460 | 0.24 | | -5.50 | -85 | -0.10 | -0.06 | | | 3,820 | 0.75 | | 3,336 | 0.56 | | -12.67 | -484 | -0.57 | -0.19 | | | 20,567 | 4.01 | | 24,916 | 4.17 | | 21.15 | 4,349 | 5.12 | 0.16 | | | 26,452 | 5.16 | | 29,281 | 4.90 | | 10.69 | 2,829 | 3.33 | -0.26 | | | 3,322 | 0.65 | | 3,346 | 0.56 | | 0.72 | 24 | 0.03 | -0.09 | | | 694 | 0.14 | | 695 | 0.12 | | 0.14 | 1 | 0.00 | -0.02 | | | 4,724 | 0.92 | | 5,165 | 0.86 | | 9.34 | 441 | 0.52 | -0.06 | | | 1,041 | 0.20 | | 952 | 0.16 | | -8.55 | -89 | -0.10 | -0.04 | | | 5,791 | 1.13 | | 5,550 | 0.93 | | -4.16 | -241 | -0.28 | -0.20 | | | 2,313 | 0.45 | | 2,154 | 0.36 | | -6.87 | -159 | -0.19 | -0.09 | | | 8,954 | 1.75 | | 8,803 | 1.47 | | -1.69 | -151 | -0.18 | -0.27 | | | 19,821 | 3.87 | | 21,177 | 3.55 | | 6.84 | 1,356 | 1.60 | -0.32 | | | 1,529 | 0.30 | | 1,457 | 0.24 | | -4.71 | -72 | -0.08 | -0.05 | | | 4,455 | 0.87 | | 4,292 | 0.72 | | -3.66 | -163 | -0.19 | -0.15 | | | 14,144 | 2.76 | | 16,279 | 2.73 | | 15.09 | 2,135 | 2.52 | -0.03 | | | 3,668 | 0.72 | | 3,468 | 0.58 | | -5.45 | -200 | -0.24 | -0.14 | | | 2,772 | 0.54 | | 2,736 | 0.46 | | -1.30 | -36 | -0.04 | -0.08 | | | 2,696 | 0.53 | | 3,023 | 0.51 | | 12.13 | 327 | 0.39 | -0.02 | | | 2,021 | 0.39 | | 2,156 | 0.36 | | 6.68 | 135 | 0.16 | -0.03 | | | 2,187 | 0.43 | | 2,449 | 0.41 | | 11.98 | 262 | 0.31 | -0.02 | | | 3,913 | 0.76 | | 4,110 | 0.69 | | 5.03 | 197 | 0.23 | -0.08 | | | 1,225 | 0.24 | | 1,362 | 0.23 | | 11.18 | 137 | 0.16 | -0.01 | | | 5,427 | 1.06 | | 5,651 | 0.95 | | 4.13 | 224 | 0.26 | -0.11 | | | 2,868 | 0.56 | | 2,816 | 0.47 | | -1.81 | -52 | -0.06 | -0.09 | | | 1,587 | 0.31 | | 1,599 | 0.27 | | 0.76 | 12 | 0.01 | -0.04 | | | 2,440 | 0.48 | | 3,145 | 0.53 | | 28.89 | 705 | 0.83 | 0.05 | | | 2,268 | 0.44 | | 2,513 | 0.42 | | 10.80 | 245 | 0.29 | -0.02 | | | 1,208 | 0.24 | | 1,596 | 0.27 | | 32.12 | 388 | 0.46 | 0.03 | | | 893 | 0.17 | | 1,096 | 0.18 | | 22.73 | 203 | 0.24 | 0.01 | | | 12,439 | 2.43 | | 14,215 | 2.38 | | 14.28 | 1,776 | 2.09 | -0.05 | | | 4,551 | 0.89 | | 4,591 | 0.77 | | 0.88 | 40 | 0.05 | -0.12 | | | 1,055 | 0.21 | | 945 | 0.16 | | -10.43 | -110 | -0.13 | -0.05 | | | 1,346 | 0.26 | | 1,399 | 0.23 | | 3.94 | 53 | 0.06 | -0.03 | | | 1,757 | 0.34 | | 2,014 | 0.34 | | 14.63 | 257 | 0.30 | -0.01 | | | 915 | 0.18 | | 839 | 0.14 | | -8.31 | -76 | -0.09 | -0.04 | | | 2,986 | 0.58 | | 3,255 | 0.54 | | 9.01 | 269 | 0.32 | -0.04 | | | 6,954 | 1.36 | | 7,806 | 1.31 | | 12.25 | 852 | 1.00 | -0.05 | | | 13,652 | 2.66 | | 17,294 | 2.90 | | 26.68 | 3,642 | 4.29 | 0.23 | | | 9,582 | 1.87 | | 31,639 | 5.30 | | 230.19 | 22,057 | 25.98 | 3.43 | | | 2,242 | 0.44 | | 2,374 | 0.40 | | 5.89 | 132 | 0.16 | -0.04 | | | 3,008 | 0.59 | | 2,882 | 0.48 | | -4.19 | -126 | -0.15 | -0.10 | | | 1,633 | 0.32 | | 1,361 | 0.23 | | -16.66 | -272 | -0.32 | -0.09 | | | 2,432 | 0.47 | | 2,697 | 0.45 | | 10.90 | 265 | 0.31 | -0.02 | | | 13,545 | 2.64 | | 12,711 | 2.13 | | -6.16 | -834 | -0.98 | -0.52 | | | 696 | 0.14 | | 772 | 0.13 | | 10.92 | 76 | 0.09 | -0.01 | | | 1,752 | 0.34 | | 1,595 | 0.27 | | -8.96 | -157 | -0.18 | -0.07 | | | 130,651 | 25.50 | | 158,648 | 26.56 | | 21.43 | 27,997 | 32.98 | 1.06 | | | 3,330 | 0.65 | | 3,500 | 0.59 | | 5.11 | 170 | 0.20 | -0.06 | | | 3,998 | 0.78 | | 4,871 | 0.82 | | 21.84 | 873 | 1.03 | 0.04 | | | 66,037 | 12.89 | | 78,060 | 13.07 | | 18.21 | 12,023 | 14.16 | 0.18 | | | 2,312 | 0.45 | | 2,140 | 0.36 | | -7.44 | -172 | -0.20 | -0.09 | | | 1,594 | 0.31 | | 1,620 | 0.27 | | 1.63 | 26 | 0.03 | -0.04 | | | 5,089 | 0.99 | | 5,639 | 0.94 | | 10.81 | 550 | 0.65 | -0.05 | | | 1,540 | 0.30 | | 1,307 | 0.22 | | -15.13 | -233 | -0.27 | -0.08 | | | 3,956 | 0.77 | | 4,096 | 0.69 | | 3.54 | 140 | 0.16 | -0.09 | | | 1,731 | 0.34 | | 2,159 | 0.36 | | 24.73 | 428 | 0.50 | 0.02 | | | 1,010 | 0.20 | | 1,234 | 0.21 | | 22.18 | 224 | 0.26 | 0.01 | | | 3,401 | 0.66 | | 3,581 | 0.60 | | 5.29 | 180 | 0.21 | -0.06 | | | 4,001 | 0.78 | | 3,845 | 0.64 | | -3.90 | -156 | -0.18 | -0.14 | | | 3,992 | 0.78 | | 4,277 | 0.72 | | 7.14 | 285 | 0.34 | -0.06 | | | 12,293 | 2.40 | | 13,226 | 2.21 | | 7.59 | 933 | 1.10 | -0.18 | | | 3,752 | 0.73 | | 3,357 | 0.56 | | -10.53 | -395 | -0.47 | -0.17 | | | 15,461 | 3.02 | | 16,733 | 2.80 | | 8.23 | 1,272 | 1.50 | -0.22 | | | 688 | 0.13 | | 619 | 0.10 | | -10.03 | -69 | -0.08 | -0.03 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 512,377 | 100.00 | | 597,263 | 100.00 | | 16.57 | 84,886 | 100.00 | 0.00 | | | 239,108 | 46.67 | | 301,443 | 50.47 | | 26.07 | 62,335 | 73.43 | 3.80 | | | 273,269 | 53.33 | | 295,820 | 49.53 | | 8.25 | 22,551 | 26.57 | -3.80 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 165,370,800 | | | 193,425,900 | | | 16.96 | 28,055,100 | | | | | 142,396,424 | | | 169,971,911 | | | 19.37 | 27,575,487 | | | | | 22,974,376 | | | 23,453,989 | | | 2.09 | 479,613 | | |
Source: Calculations by the South Dakota Regional Economic Analysis Project (SD-REAP)
with data provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis November 2023 REAP_PI_CA1400_YRVYR_1000A | | | | | |
| |
